okay, time for a little biography of my religious upbringing for all you pagans out there.
i had been going to GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH before i was two, playing under the pews. i wasn’t baptized until age six. i was confirmed in junior high. i went to church every sunday and wednesday. i learned the old testament: genesis, exodus, leviticus, numbers, deuteronomy, joshua, judges, ruth, first book of samuel, second book of samuel, first and second kings, and the chronicles too, ezra, nehemia, esther, job, 150 psalms, and the proverbs too, eccelsiastes next, then the song of solomon, isaiah, jeremiah... i can't remember any more. i learned the new testament: matthew, mark, luke, john, acts, romans, first and second corinthians, galations, epehsians, phillippians, colossians, first and second thessalonians... i can't remember the rest. my mom always read the bible to me and my sister. we covered most of it, then i read it again myself. numbers was my favorite. i kid.
then i matriculated to the most pagan of institutions. one of the courses i took my first semester at dear old MACALESTER was cultures in conflict, taught by professor overman. one book that made a huge impact on me was “christians as the romans saw them.” i read books about paganism and i also purchased a bible containing the apocrypha, which i knew nothing about because protestant churches generally exclude the apocrypha. martin luther rejected the books due to some verses that seemed to contradict his views, especially a verse in second maccabees which alludes to purgatory: "it is a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead that they may be loosed from their sins". by the way, the word APOCRYPHA, from the greek "hidden", refers in general to religious works that are not considered canonical, or part of officially-accepted scripture. such works are often believed not to have been "inspired" or to be in some way "less inspired" by divine processes or entities, such as holy wisdom or the holy spirit. am i inspired. hmmm. most works that are considered apocryphal in the hebrew bible were written in languages other than hebrew, such as greek or aramaic.
from the apocrypha i read the books of judith, esther, and first and second maccabees. judith dresses up all skanky and cuts off the head of an invading general. esther is a brave queen who prevents the genocide of jews. first maccabees tells the story of the conquest of palestine by the greeks under alexander the great, the attempt by the greeks to impose greek culture on the jews, and the jewish revolt against that domination. it’s not as exciting as it sounds. second maccabees focuses on the jews' revolt against antiochus and concludes with the defeat of the syrian general nicanor in 161 bc by judas maccabeus. catholics and orthodox consider second maccabees to be a canonical and part of the bible, while protestants regard it as apocryphal. most jews, while not considering it to be scripture, consider it useful as a historical supplement to first maccabees, but reject most of the doctrinal innovations present in the work. on a side note about MARTYRS, it should be known that the long descriptions of the martyrdoms of eleazer and of a mother with her seven sons (2 macc 6:18-7:42) caught the imagination of medieval christians. several churches are dedicated to the maccabeean martyrs, and they are among the very few pre-christian figures to appear on the catholic calendar of saints' days. the book is considered the first model of the medieval stories of the martyrs.
and moving right along. the summer after graduating from macalester i read the KORAN. it was repetitive and boring and i was provided no succor from the all clement. my reading of the koran provided me with good insight on the contrast between, on one hand, the intellectual analysis of text and, on the other hand, the indoctrination from growing up with religion, and the acting out of meaning and cultural observance of religion in everyday life through prayer, worship, fellowship, holidays (looks a little like holy days doesn’t it), etc.
would i recommend reading the bible. no. but, as the big fundamentals, i always believe that it’s good to know the basics.
i would recommend a few books of the bible. job is a good one, an exercise is theodicy, the reconciliation of the co-existence of evil and god. ecclesiastes is a good short read. it’s place in the bible always makes me laugh. everything is utterly senseless. i wish i was special. also, if you are named after a book of the bible, you should read that book. habakkuk should read habakkuk. jude should read jude, it’s the fourth shortest book in the bible. paul, you have your work cut out for you because you should read all the letters of paul. that goes for those of you named saul too. does anyone know why.